![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Question for y'all:
Sep. 10th, 2005 07:45 pmDo you think that the population of this country has gotten to the point where having a good, efficient, and fair method of government is pretty much impossible and that we can only try to find/use the method of fucking up least?
If so, and this is pointed at![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
dolohov in particular, is there _any_ size N of human population(where N > 1) where being able to have an efficient and fair government is realistic, rather than have things blow up in one direction and/or another?
Is this problem something inherent in humans, or is it something which could theoretically be overcome with education? Is it also an inherent problem with human societies?
Yes, I've been looking at Churchill quotes.
Edit: The note to John was included because if I didn't specify N > 1, I expected him to answer "yes. N=1." Or perhaps "any N, as long as I'm supreme fascist dictator with 'irresistable power'."
If so, and this is pointed at
dolohov in particular, is there _any_ size N of human population(where N > 1) where being able to have an efficient and fair government is realistic, rather than have things blow up in one direction and/or another?Is this problem something inherent in humans, or is it something which could theoretically be overcome with education? Is it also an inherent problem with human societies?
Yes, I've been looking at Churchill quotes.
Edit: The note to John was included because if I didn't specify N > 1, I expected him to answer "yes. N=1." Or perhaps "any N, as long as I'm supreme fascist dictator with 'irresistable power'."
